SB0149

SB0149 and A17.3 Being Removed...What Does It Mean?

I have not yet heard or not if Illinois Legislators have contacted the Elevator Safety Board for their input on SB0149 after the Senate Passed the Bill and I don't believe that they have or will. For those Illinois House Representatives out there who have not yet voted or reviewed the bill and are wondering what the big deal is about the removal of A17.3 is, I've provided some additional reading for you.  Below you will find two 17.3 blog posts from an elevator consultant in Florida who does an excellent job of balancing common sense with the building owners best interest at heart. Our legislators could use a little more information before listening to angry Condo Boards who sacrifice safety for dollars.

A17.3 - Florida and What It Means

All The Relevant A17.3 - Posts From Alliance Elevator Consultants

Again this is a different state requiring A17.3 1996 but dealing with the same issues of balancing elevator code safety requirements with the cost for complying with them. If the the Illinois House of Representatives passes SB0149 with A17.3 removed existing elevators without certain safety devices will put the public at risk. Plus trying to get the requirement for A17.3 back into the Elevator Safety Act will require another Senate or House Bill which could take years to pass.

Attention Illinois Legislators, put A17.3 back in the bill and work with the Elevator Safety Board in negotiating the rest of the items that were removed. If there is ever a death or accident that could have been prevented if A17.3 was in SB0149 it's going to come back an haunt someone. Missing door restrictor, fire service, blown out hydraulic cylinders, it's just a matter of time.

Post: May 13th, 2009: ERS-2009-05-13 #158 Show Notes

Click Here to download ERS-2009-05-13 #158 As I balance my allergy medicine and coffee intake I do my best to get through this weeks show but struggle a bit. Unfortunately some very sad news as an elevator mechanic is struck by an elevator and killed in Florida.  It seems that there are multiple accidents in the news which involve kids and adults. In addition to these stories you'll get to hear me rant a bit on a Illinois Senate Bill extending the time that elevators are required to comply with code. Our legislators are under the impression this extension has the full support of the Illinois elevator community, which is not true. Thanks for joining us today on the show everyone, be safe out there!

Calendar Of Events: NAESA Calendar NAEC Calendar NAVTP Calendar EIG SC Calendar CEA Calendar EAF Calendar ECNY Calendar CECA Calendar EESF Calendar  Elevator U Calendar MESA Calendar  NCEIG Calendar 

Sponsors/Listener Links: ElevatorU.org - 2009 Conference Fast Approaching   Escalator Step Cleaning Video Launched!   Peoples National Bank Restoration Project

News Links: Winners announced for ThyssenKrupp elevator architect award New Albany Teen discusses surviving elevator accident Elevator Rules – from the Shark Guys The public transportation of Hong Kong That had to hurt 18 Month Old gets finger stuck in escalator, doesn't even cry, tough little guy! Speaking my language  So this is what an elevator of death looks like Schindler Elevator chosen for Pittsburgh Project Elevator entrapment again Red Springs Town Hall to get new elevator Old parking elevator photo Old antique elevator components are desired NY personal injury lawyer comments on elevator accident     New elevator to be installed in Bellinghams’ Federal Building MCA Denver presents humorous art exhibit, including laughing escalators Man plunges to his death in elevator shaft Man found dead in elevator, Mumbai Man literally gets stuck in elevator, viewer discretion advised! Is your elevator safe Chicago Tribune Article Injured women upset because building elevator doesn’t work Illinois Senate Bill SB0149 puts public at risk Hospital faces legal fight after pensioner injured in escalator fall Groom is trapped in elevator prior to wedding 24 students try to cram themselves into elevator at high school   Boy rescued from elevator shaft, Bronx, NY More on story above City counters Chicago Tribune elevator inspection claims Elevator Repair man dies in elevator accident 6 Hurt when tower elevator plunges

Illinois Senate Bill (SB0149) extends elevator code requirement compliance by years, puts public at risk!

question%20markI had received an e-mail from a concerned elevator professional last week regarding SB0149 that if passed by those in the Illinois House would put the public at risk. Currently the bill has already passed the Senate and is up for short debate as of May 10th, 2009. The bill is pushing back the date that elevators must comply with the Elevator Safety Act to 2015 is a huge mistake. Can someone out there explain to me what the point of having an elevator safety act and code if we’re not going to adhere to it? We also have some very sharp people who sit on our Elevator Safety Board who could have provided some excellent insight on SB0149 which I don’t believe had the opportunity to. After contacting many of our House of Representatives and Senate Sponsors regarding the bill and that fact that it should have been reviewed entirely by the State Elevator Safety Board for their input I was surprised to have received an e-mail stating the following.

Mr. Sybert,  In response to SB149, this was negoatiated by the Lobbyists for Elevator Union, the Elevator Manufacturers, the Director of the Illinois Elevator Board and representatives from Otis and Koney over a 3 week period of time.  These individuals represented the elevator industries interest in this matter.  Any questions should be directed to these individuals on SB149,. (corrected on 5/15/09)

So I did as was asked, I reached out to the elevator community and directed my question, did we as an industry support this bill? The answer I got was NO.  While our legislators believe that the bill has the support and backing of the elevator industry the majority of the legislators do not realize that A17.3 Safety Code For Existing Elevator and Escalators was taken out of the Bill 2-3 days before the senate passed it.

Wow, this almost knocked me off my chair. While I can’t say the above is true or false as I was not at the hearings or meetings that might have taken place I am writing trying to figure out the logic that might have come from our industry. If I were a cartoon, I’d have a HUGE question mark over my head in a thought bubble.  

Why would the Elevator Union hire Lobbyists to extend the time that elevators are required to comply with the Elevator Safety Act? With record numbers of elevator mechanics on the bench/unemployed why would they hire Lobbyist to put even more of them out of work? This goes for the two major elevator manufacturers/contractors who were named, who shall remain nameless. Something smells fishy, that’s what I think.

Those who sponsored Senate Bill 0149, which I believe was backed by some very unhappy building owners and condo associations about having to spend money on their elevators, is wrong in there determination that the need for the Elevator Safety Act is not required.  

Mark my words, the first elevator death outside the City of Chicago, but in Illinois that relates to a blown out hydraulic cylinder, an unrestricted elevator door or a safety item not required by A17.3 needs to go back to the Senate and House Sponsors of this bill. Those who investigate out there look deep; determine if the accident or death could have been prevented had the bill not extended the compliance date. Then share what you found with the world.

What I believe that you’ll find is that the bill was backed originally by the building/elevator owners and condo associations. I’ll also bet you a nickel that you’ll find that all of the members of the Illinois State Elevator Board did not get the opportunity to fully review the bill and make recommendations to the State Legislators.